The growing demand for sustainable farming practices has brought attention to the environmental implications of slower-growing chickens.
While these birds are often promoted for improved welfare standards, their carbon footprint reveals a complex trade-off.
Slower-growing chickens require more time to reach market weight, consuming additional feed and water compared to their fast-growing counterparts. This extended rearing period increases emissions associated with feed production, transport, and land use. For instance, feed crops like soy and corn often contribute significantly to deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions.
Recently, KFC announced it will not meet the 2026 deadline for the Better Chicken Commitment (BCC), citing limited availability of slower-growing breeds and concerns over their carbon impact. The fast-food chain highlighted the challenge of balancing animal welfare improvements with the environmental costs of longer rearing periods, increased feed demand, and extended energy use in housing.
While proponents of slower-growing chickens argue these birds experience better health and lower mortality rates, reducing waste, the broader environmental implications remain a concern. Policymakers, producers, and consumers must weigh these factors carefully to find a path that delivers both welfare improvements and environmental sustainability.
